MEDICAL ASSOCIATION FOR PREVENTION OF WAR (AUSTRALIA) 
 
MEDIA RELEASE 
 
Tuesday, 15 December 2009 
 
 
DOCTORS CALL FOR FAST TRACK TO ZERO NUCLEAR WEAPONS 
 
The Medical Association for Prevention of War applauded a new Australia-sponsored report 
for recognising the destructive potential of nuclear weapons, but criticised the slow pace of 
disarmament proposed by the report. 
 
 While recognising the importance, feasibility and urgency of nuclear disarmament, the 
Commission has failed in its major task: developing a plan to get to zero nuclear weapons, 
said Association President Dr Bill Williams.  
 
The report proposes a 90% cut in nuclear weapons arsenals by 2025. This would still leave 
2,000 nuclear warheads, and we now know that 100 warheads could cause unprecedented 
climatic effects, slashing food production and causing upwards of a billion people to starve.  
  
The International Commission on Nuclear Non-proliferation and Disarmament presented their 
report Eliminating Nuclear Threats to the Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd and his 
Japanese counterpart Yukio Hatoyama today.  
 
Dr Williams welcomed the Commissions reminder that nuclear weapons have a unique 
capacity to destroy life on this planet.  
 
He noted that the Commission recognises the need for a Nuclear Weapons Convention  
advocated by MAPW, and recently supported by Australias 2009 parliamentary report on 
nuclear treaties.  
 
However Dr Williams regretted that the report represented a missed opportunity for boldness 
of vision.  
 
There have been some really exciting developments in nuclear disarmament recently: what 
we need from our leaders now is clear direction and courageous steps. Unfortunately the 
Commission appears to be applying the brakes he said.  
 
We are also alarmed that the report uncritically supports the nuclear power industry. It fails to 
recognise its key role in the proliferation of nuclear weapons, while perptrating the myth of 
peaceful nuclear energy. The Commission acknowledges the need to manage the nuclear 
industry risks, particularly in relation to uranium enrichment and spent fuel reprocessing. But 
the proliferation-resistant technologies it refers to, do not yet exist. 
 
In a world facing the twin crises of climate change and nuclear weapons, the nuclear industry 
should not be encouraged to soak up money and resources. These should be allocated to 
research and innovation of safer technologies rather than those which expand the problem of 
nuclear weapons proliferation Dr Williams concluded. 
 
Contacts: 
Dr Bill Williams, President: 0428 616 245 or (h) 03 5261 6245  
Dr Sue Wareham: Immediate Past President: 0407 924 152